Moral Turpitude, part two

Well, his moral turpitude extends beyond brotherly threesomes and campus sexcapades to include cheating on a spouse. Witness our recent (as in still going on) IM conversation.

Michelle says:
did you ever cheat on anyone?
Cheater says:
depends, kinda a gray area
Michelle says:
why gray?
Cheater says:
yes I have
Michelle says:
did anyone ever cheat on you?
Cheater says:
um I thing so
Cheater says:
why?
Michelle says:
watching an oprah about cheaters
Michelle says:
and this one woman is staying with her husband who cheated
Michelle says:
and i have a friend who stayed with her husband after he cheated
Michelle says:
if i ever found out bryan cheated i would let him know with the divorce papers
Cheater says:
I think that in many cases it is still a fairly good idea to stay with your husband or wife after a cheaing episode
Michelle says:
hell no
Michelle says:
why would i want to be with anyone who would do that to another person?
Cheater says:
The way I see it is that a marriage is a commitment of life togather because it is important to both persons. Just because one of em got some on the side would not necessarily denote grounds to end a life long commitment that was so important to both people
Cheater says:
I mean really what actuall harm is done
Cheater says:
Its not like your husbands prick has not ever been in another woman
Michelle says:
well, it is a commitment like a contract. bound by certain terms which are agreed to by b oth parties
Michelle says:
if one party breaches the contract by violating one of the terms, forget it
Cheater says:
the act itself is not really anything new, just the date after which it took place
Michelle says:
so then i am thinking you should probably stay single
Michelle says:
or find someone who agrees with your terms
Michelle says:
i do not
Cheater says:
well, I am just saying that if you are married to the right person I dont think that a single act of indescretion is worth ending this holy sacred alliance between two people if it is really that great of a union which it should be if you get married then an accidental slip up should not be enough to end such a union
Michelle says:
my argument is that if you are married to the right person, there are no accidental slip ups
Michelle says:
if it is that great, there is no reason for it
Cheater says:
we are only human, and humans make mistakes period.
Michelle says:
a mistake is buying crunchy instead of plain peanut butter, not slipping your dick into some woman who isn't your wife
Cheater says:
the woman I cheated on was one I never thought I would. I was really into her...but one night I got really drunk and blacked, I came too because of a pain to my neck which was this woman on top of me given me a hicky while my shlong was in her.
Cheater says:
I had been an active participant but not really consciously aware of it until the pain
Cheater says:
slipping your dick into another woman phsically hurts no one, I would think a single act of violance would be grounds for ending a marriage.
Cheater says:
and emotionally hurts no one if she dont ever find out
Michelle says:
but is that really the kind of person you want to be?
Cheater says:
what kind?
Michelle says:
the kind who doesn't care about another person's feelings... a person who you would presumably care enough about to marry or otherwise commit to?
Cheater says:
Um no, this was not my description of someone I was aspiring to be, just pointing out facts
Michelle says:
well, you seem to agree with that reasoning
Cheater says:
I just think that the holy vow of marriage should withstand a single act of indescretion that phyically hurts no one
Cheater says:
God forgives and probably expects us to forgive people too.
Now someone who is a cheater as oppoosed to an accidental shaggin should lose his or her significant other
Michelle says:
well, i think anyone who would break such an important promise is capable of more than one "indiscretion" and i am not going to stick around for an encore
Cheater says:
to each her own
Michelle says:
ya, no agreeing on this one
Cheater says:
nope